Dansday

I always open to anyone building interesting tools

I always open to anyone building interesting tools

Published on May 7, 2026

I frequently get messages from developers asking me to take a look at their new open-source projects. Sometimes it is a library, other times a CLI tool, or a platform utility. I have always believed that if I have the time, looking under the hood of what other builders are working on is one of the best ways to keep learning. It is not just about giving feedback; it is about seeing how someone else approaches a problem I might encounter myself.

Recently, I received a message about a project called git-lrc, which focuses on running AI-powered micro code reviews at commit time. It reached a solid milestone on Product Hunt, and the team reached out to see if I had any thoughts. This is exactly the kind of workflow-centric tool that catches my attention. It targets a specific pain point—getting feedback on code before it even leaves the local environment—and tries to streamline it for the developer.

When I evaluate these kinds of projects, I am not looking for perfection. I am looking for three specific things that tell me if a tool has legs:

    1. Does it solve a genuine friction point?
    I do not care about fancy marketing or over-engineered features. I care about whether the tool solves a real problem. If a tool requires more setup time than the manual effort it is trying to replace, it fails. Code reviews are often the biggest bottleneck in development; if a tool can provide meaningful insights at commit time, it has clear value.
    2. Is the developer experience (DX) prioritized?
    How easy is it to install? How does it behave in my terminal? If I have to spend thirty minutes configuring environment variables or debugging dependency conflicts before I can run a simple test, I lose interest quickly. Good open-source tools respect my time.
    3. Is it extensible?
    I look at the source code, not just the documentation. If the project is rigid, it will die as soon as the user's requirements change. If I can see where the hooks are, where I can configure the AI prompts, or where I can pipe output elsewhere, I am far more likely to stick with it.

My inbox is always open to anyone building interesting tools. If you are working on something that solves a developer problem, do not hesitate to reach out on LinkedIn. I cannot promise I will get to everything immediately, but I do appreciate the effort of builders who are trying to make the daily grind a little bit better.